← All posts
Comparison·4 min read

Grok 4.5 vs GPT-5.6: The Newest Flagships, Compared

Grok 4.5 vs GPT-5.6: xAI’s $2/$6 flagship with 500k context meets OpenAI’s $5/$30 Sol on identical one-shot coding prompts — live outputs, community votes decide.


July 2026 delivered two frontier flagships almost on top of each other. OpenAI shipped GPT-5.6 Sol, the top of the tiered line we covered in GPT-5.6 is here, at $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output. xAI answered with Grok 4.5 — its newest flagship at $2 in and $6 out, carrying a 500k-token context window. Newest against newest, both claiming the frontier, priced 2.5× apart on input and 5× apart on output. Spec sheets cannot settle which claim holds. The same one-shot coding prompt, run through both and judged blind, can at least keep the argument honest.

Grok 4.5GPT-5.6 Sol
MakerxAIOpenAI
Price (per 1M tokens)$2 input / $6 output$5 input / $30 output
Output-to-input price ratio3 : 16 : 1
Headline bet500k-token context at near-mid-tier pricingFrontier reasoning depth with a low → xhigh effort dial

The price gap is bigger than it looks

List prices say 2.5× on input and 5× on output, but flagships of this generation are output machines: they think in tokens and bill you for the thinking. Sol’s 6-to-1 output-to-input ratio against Grok’s 3-to-1 means the gap widens exactly where these models spend the most. On a code-heavy task, one Sol pass can cost what four or five Grok 4.5 passes do — which quietly reframes the question from “which model is better?” to “is one deliberate pass worth a handful of attempts on the other?”

What each flagship is betting on

  • Grok 4.5 bets on room. A 500k-token context window means whole-repo prompts, sprawling specs and long agent transcripts fit in one call — no chunking, no retrieval gymnastics.
  • Grok 4.5 bets on price. At $2/$6 it is priced like a mid-tier and positioned like a flagship — an explicit play to be the default you reach for without doing budget math first.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol bets on depth. The premium buys deliberation: an effort dial from low up to xhigh, and a model tuned to catch the edge case on the first pass — which matters most when there is no second pass.
Newest versus newest is the one matchup nobody has priors on — not reviewers, not benchmark suites, not the vendors themselves.
Why this post quotes no scores

Both models are days old and our tallies are community votes, which move in real time as people watch the outputs and vote blind. Any number printed here would be stale before you finished the paragraph. The live leaderboard is the source of truth — votes, cost per task and generation times included.

Same prompt, one shot, both flagships

Both models run in our arena under the same rules every other model gets: one-shot generation from the identical published prompt, no retries, no cherry-picking, and the result runs live in your browser across 40+ coding and design challenges — landing pages, arcade games, physics sims, emulators. Load Grok 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol to watch the two newest flagships build the same landing page side by side. Then open the arena and swap in a game or a logic-heavy task — the pairing that looks settled on one challenge has a habit of flipping on the next.

Which flagship should you reach for?

Split it by what the task actually demands. Reach for Grok 4.5 when volume and context are the constraint — huge inputs, many attempts, workloads where a 5× output-price gap compounds daily. Reach for Sol when a single pass has to be right — dense specs, real logic, code you will ship without reading line by line. And hold both opinions loosely: these models are a week old, the votes are still landing, and the honest answer today is “watch them run and vote for the one you would ship.” That tally — everyone’s votes combined, updated live — is the comparison neither spec sheet can fake.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than GPT-5.6 Sol for coding?

There is no fixed answer yet — both models shipped in July 2026 and rankings move as the community votes. On testingmodels.com both take identical one-shot coding prompts, the outputs run live in the browser, and blind votes decide. The current standing is always on the leaderboard.

How much cheaper is Grok 4.5 than GPT-5.6 Sol?

On list price, Grok 4.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output, against $5 and $30 for GPT-5.6 Sol — 2.5 times cheaper on input and 5 times cheaper on output. Because these models generate a lot of output tokens, the real per-task gap usually sits closer to the 5x end.

What is Grok 4.5’s context window?

Grok 4.5 ships with a 500,000-token context window — large enough to hold a mid-sized repository, a long specification, or an extended agent transcript in a single call, without chunking or retrieval.

How does testingmodels.com compare Grok 4.5 and GPT-5.6?

Both models receive the same prompt with one attempt — no retries, no cherry-picking. The generated apps render live in the browser, the community votes blind before model names are revealed, and rankings come from those votes rather than benchmark suites.

Don’t take the post’s word for it

The arena runs every model’s real output live. Pick a challenge, go blind, and cast a vote that counts in the public tally.

Open the arena